NICK XENOPHON AUSTRALIAN INDEPENDENT SENATOR DEFIES UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHT
NICK XENOPHON AUSTRALIAN INDEPENDENT SENATOR DEFIES UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Professor Brian Wilson
Nick Xenophon attacks High Court Of Australia
The stunt of attacking religions as “not religions” has been well documented.
Professor Brian R. Wilson will be remembered as one of the most prominent academic champions of religious liberty in the 20th century. He defended new religious movements and other minorities against the various waves of international anti-cult campaigns, for no other personal reason than his passionate love for freedom and justice, since he defined himself as an atheist. Read more Emeritus Professor Brian R. Wilson
Nick Xenophon has used letters from apostates (ex-members who become openly critical of the group they were once a member of) as evidence to slur the name of The Church Of Scientology. Poor Nick Xenophon may not know that using apostates is a stunt of the media people managing his PR (Public Relations) and he is being used as a puppet to present the falsehoods. In his speech Xenophen acknowledged Brian Seymour of TV Channel 7 Today Tonight for his valuable help. Xenophon’s right hand man is a former Brian Seymour junior at Today Tonight, one Rohan Wenn, who took a massive salary drop to work for Xenophon and now manages Xenophon’s PR.

Ex-Today Tonight reporter Rohan Wenn could be Senate bound

Rohan Ween - Senator Dreams
“If successful, Rohan Wenn would almost certainly be the first tabloid television news reporter to flick the switch from pure populism to its even more artful form, politics.His maiden speech could be a true pot of gold, full of shock revelations, denunciations and drama.
Today Tonight meets parliamentary privilege.
Could you imagine anything more amusing?
Source: VexNews

Today Tonight's Brian Seymour
Brian Seymour has been sourcing and running black PR stories about The Church Of Scientology for two years. Rohan Wenn likewise has been running high PR exposure for the Anonymous hate group. Seymour was the first to raise the hate group “Anonymous” to prominence and gives air time to this Cyberspace terrorist network which attacked Prime minister Rudd’s website and also The Church Of Scientology. Two Anonymous members were jailed this week in New york for more than one year for the attack on Mr. Rudd’s website and the church Of Scientology. Read more… Attack on Prime Minister Rudd and Scientology sentencing
Nick Xenophon’s PR men are the key promoters of a self proclaimed hate group called Anonynous (a.k.a. Cyber Terrorists).
To back this up, poor Nick Xenophon is a Barrister and well knows the subject of the reliability of witnesses when presenting evidence. This is odd for a barrister mounting an extraordinary attack on the validity of the High Court Of Australia ruling in 1988 that decreed The Church Of Scientology as a bona fide religion. Why has Xenophon put his sworn oath to upheld the Australian Legal System in jeopardy?
Surely Xenophon knows all about the linkage of his right hand man and his previous employer at Channel & to the Anonymous hate group?
The most famous studies on the reliability of anti-religious witnesses, especially of apostates was done by Professor Brian Wilson deceased, previously Emeritus Professor Oxford University, in his published Article “Cults & New Religious Movements: Apostates – Apostasy – Apostate Syndrome:”
“In recent decades, given the emergence of so many new religious bodies which make strong demands on the loyalty of their members, instances of apostasy have become matters of considerable attention for the mass media. The apostate’s story, in which he is usually presented as a victim, is seen as good news-copy for the media, particularly if he offers to ‘reveal’ aspects, and perhaps secrets, of the movement to which he formerly belonged.
In consequence, apostates receive perhaps an unwarranted amount of media attention, particularly when they are able to present their previous allegiance in terms both of their own vulnerability and the manipulation, deception, or coercion exercised by the leaders and members of the movement into which they were recruited.
Because these accounts are often the only information normally available to the general public about minority religions, and certainly the most widely disseminated information, the apostate becomes a central figure in the formation (or misformation) of opinion in the public domain concerning these movements.”
Read more about this syndrome: Cults & New Religious Movements: Apostates – Apostasy – Apostate Syndrome:
NICK XENOPHON AUSTRALIAN INDEPENDENT SENATOR DEFIES UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Nick Xenophon is in the hands of media professionals and Professor Wilson’s studies bear out the unreliability of apostates as witnesses. As any trained lawyer should know when dealing with witnesses:
“Academic scholars interested in religious minorities, and in particular sociologists, in whose field this subject matter particularly lies, normally pursue their scholarly enquiries by a variety of well-recognized methods.
They gather their data not only by archival research and the study of printed matter and documents, but also by participant observation, interviews, questionnaire surveys and, directly to the point at issue here, from informants. Apostates are often very willing informants, but sociologists generally exercise considerable caution with respect to this possible source of evidence.
As I have written elsewhere, in discussion of the sociologist’s techniques of inquiry:”
Read more about this syndrome: Cults & New Religious Movements: Apostates – Apostasy – Apostate Syndrome:
NICK XENOPHON AUSTRALIAN INDEPENDENT SENATOR DEFIES UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Xenophon and his media managers refused to communicate and investigate with The Church Of Scientology and instead pushed forward apostates. According to Professor Brian Wilson’s work, the singular motivation for using apostates is media publicity.
NICK XENOPHON AUSTRALIAN INDEPENDENT SENATOR DEFIES UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
The Australian Nov 21 2009 The Political Pursuit Of Religion: “The Prime Minister’s [ Kevin Rudd ] intervention raised my eyebrows. So I revisited the 1983 judgment of the High Court in Church of the New Faith v Commissioner of Payroll Tax (Victoria).”
The question as to whether Scientology is a religion was settled in the 1983 case. Scientology is a religion and its practice is protected under section 116 of the Constitution. The Church of Scientology is entitled to the same tax exemptions enjoyed by all religions, not the least Rudd’s Anglicans and my Lutherans.
There is nothing the government or the parliament [ including Nick Xenophon ] can do to withdraw the Church of Scientology’s status as a religion. Under our constitutional structure, it is the High Court that has the function of ruling whether Scientology is a religion and this it has done.
Why does Xenophon attack The Church Of Scientology?
All religions depend on their tax-exempt status based on the test case decision handed down by the High Court in their 1983 judgment of the High Court in Church of the New Faith v Commissioner of Payroll Tax (Victoria). The Church Of Scientology does not operate any businesses and relies solely on donations from its parishoners who do not receive tax deductions for their donations (except to building funds).
However, interests wanting to tax other religions must overturn the High Court decision defining The Church Of Scientology as a religion. No other religion has been decreed as a religion by a High Court Ruling.
Being unable to claim The Church Of Scientology should be taxed, as it has no business profits to tax, Xenophon has resorted to publicly smear The Church Of Scientology and force a Senate Inquiry. A Senate Inquiry as Xenophon knows does not have rules of evidence either.
So who is behind Nick Xenophon? Ultimately the puppet master is yet to reveal himself. However we do know his media managers are Rolan Ween, and Xenophon named Chanell 7’s “Today Tonight Brian Seymour in the Senate.
NICK XENOPHON AUSTRALIAN INDEPENDENT SENATOR DEFIES UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
So what does the above have to do with Human Rights Abuse?
Late at night in the Australian Senate when only five other Senators were in the Senate (two of them asleep) Nick Xenophon launched his extraordinary attck on the Church of Scientolgoy as Plaintiff, Judge and Jury declaring The Church Of Scientology “an international criminal organization.” Xenophon called for a Senate Inquiry which has no rules of evidence as any competent court would have.
The Articles of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights disregarded by Senator Nick Xenophon:
Article 8 – United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
* Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.
Article 10 – United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
* Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.
Article 11 – United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
* (1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defense.
* (2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.
As is quite well known The Church Of Scientology opposes the drugging of unborn children, pregnant mothers, and school children. The Church of Scientology is often attacked by front groups acting on behalf of drug companies. It is a fact well documented by the Church Of Scientology. Is it reasonable to assume that lurking somewhere behind poor Nick Xenophon, Brian Seymour and Rohan Ween are psychiatric interests?
Is one right in concluding Xenophon’s attack is a PR stunt?
END
Other Articles on Human Rights and Religion:
Attack on Prime Minister Rudd and Scientology sentencing
Nick Xenophon attack on scientology celebrity backfires
Nick Xenophon Scientology Attack motives Political Pursuit Of Religion







